Thanks for your response. OK, one gateway. So I should leave the LAN
NIC's gateway blank? This is how I have it currently setup and I cannot
access the internal interface. Therefore, would creating a route rule be
in order? And if so, would it be essentially: if you need to access
192.168.0.0/24 then _what?_. Should I be able to ping an interface w/o a
gateway??
Julian
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 11:38:35PM -0400, Julian Underwood wrote:
Dear Linux-Net list,
I am struggling with a Fedora Core 2 server which I am trying to put
together and was wondering if someone could offer a suggestion. This
should be a simple answer for someone. I have a server which is connected
directly to DSL and to a LAN.
You can only have one default gateway, and in your case it should be
out the DSL link. All browsing from the server will go via the DSL
link. If that;s not what you want you need source based routing, but
that's way beyond what's explainable over an email. Go lookup some of
the online documentation.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
