David S. Miller wrote: > > If the problem is win2000/xp not waking up its http client, why one > > PSH per window? Why not one PSH per N kilobytes or one per second? > > (One per second would be better for web browers over dialup, wouldn't it?) > > Because if the window fills up, we'll deadlock since the client > won't drain the data and the receiver will advertize a zero > window which we can't send into. Ok. It's done to prevent deadlock rather than improve Windows performance. Fair enough :) > > Can you point me to a web page with more information about this bug? > > It is not documented, Alexey noticed it via packet traces sent to > him years ago. Are the discussion or packet traces in a mail archive somewhere? Thanks, -- Jamie - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
