Re: [Fwd: Divert Sockets in current Linux versions?]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Juergen Nickelsen wrote:
Neil Horman wrote:

Yes, Netlink sockets are a good replacement for this mechanism.

[etc.]

Thanks! This sounds indeed quite like what I am looking for.

[...] I'm writing a whitepaper on the subject, and will post it when its ready.


Do you have an estimation when this will be? I'd be very interested to read it.

Regards, Juergen.

As promised, a very early version of what will eventully become a netlink sockets programming guide. Be forewarned, its got no examples, useage descriptions, or any of the other niceties that you've come to expect from most programming guides. It does have the rough outline of how netlink sockets in genereal, and how the netlink_firewall protocol in particular, work, however. Let me know if you find it helpful, or if there is anything you would especially like to see in the finished version. That goes for any interested party (I'd like this to be a usefull paper).

The paper, and any future versions can be found here:
http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/papers/netlink.pdf

Neil

--
/***************************************************
 *Neil Horman
 *Software Engineer
 *Red Hat, Inc.
 *nhorman@redhat.com
 *gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1
 *http://www.keyserver.net
 ***************************************************/
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux