Re: IP Address?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 11:15:28AM +0530, A, Honne Gowda (Honne) wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am confuesd abt the validity of IP addresses...
> 
> By convention or standard IP address are classiffied like Class
> A(0-127),Class B(128-191) class C(192-223),class D(224-239) and Class E(
> 240-247)..

Lookup CIDR. Those classes arn't really used that way anymore. Some
people have large assignments but they're hard to get.

> My question here is : are the following IP addresses valid for assignment..
> If not why?
> 
> 0.0.0.0 
> 10.0.0.0
> 126.0.0.0
> 192.0.0.0

Anything with a 0 or 255 at the end should probably be avoided to
prevent confusion with broadcast addresses. 10.x.x.x is a private
address space defined by some RFC. The 0.0.0.0 is just not allowed, it
would be confused with INADDR_ANY. The other two could be allocated as
a block for a /24, though currently they are reserved.

IOW, there is no technical reason (other than the 0.0.0.0 one) why they
can't be allocated to a network. They just aren't for public use right
now.
-- 
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

Attachment: pgpM7QXlhZSM0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux