Re: [netfilter-core] memory leak with IP connection tracking and IP forwarding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 01:05:55PM +0200, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm experiencing a major memory leak if I run a router with IP connection
> tracking enabled and packets larger than MTU size.

How do you observe such a memory leak?  What exact values are you
looking at?

> If I do a 'ping -f -s 64000 <Host B>' from host A via the router, the
> router is losing more then 10 MB of memory per second.
> Without connection tracking everything works fine.
> 
> My only glue so far is that the skbuff_head_cache is growing. Connection
> tracking has a hook in the IP stack, where it gets hold of packets. If these
> packets are fragmented (due to the packet size being larger than MTU size)
> they are reassembled by ip_conntrack. So I guess the memory leak might
> be somewhere in there.

Did you enable support for bridging?

There was a bug in the bridging (bridging firewall) code which made it
'forget' to drop the reference count (and thus introduced a memory
leak).

> Regards,
> Thomas.

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>             http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
  "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
   architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
   on while IP was being designed."                    -- Paul Vixie

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux