Re: skb data uncacheable ??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Nagendra Singh Tomar wrote:

> even for devices that do Rx checksum verification (and hence allow us to 
> leave the data payload untouched). If we can have a strategy in which we 
> keep first 128 bytes say (precisely max possible  header size) in a 
> cacheable region and the rest, that is pure data, in uncacheable region, 
> we can see some gain.

This should not be difficult if using non-linear sk_buff.

> The most important question: Is it worth all this ? DO we gain much if we 
> prevent pollution of the data cache, by doing these tricks.

I am doubtful, but I am possibly biased from working a lot with iptables 
and often accessing the payload while the packet is forwarded for NAT 
etc.. but maybe.

Regards
Henrik

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux