Two problems: 1) Don't do the config option thing if we're going to auto-size. 2) Your ram_mb calcs use PAGE_SIZE as a term, and therefore assume it has a value of 4096 or somesuch. Please remove this assumption. To be honest, while I'm not against making the tables a little bigger, for ARP "WHO THE FUCK CARES" if another 100 cycles or so are burnt on a lookup. What setup do you have where ARP performance is a real issue? Your original email was nice in describing the fact that ARP does not scale, but you've made no foundation on which to erect a claim that scalability for ARP (and thus the added complexity/changes) is even necessary. - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
