Re: the return values of dev_mc_add and dev_mc_delete

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:30:06 -0800
"Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org> wrote:

> | 	There are a few more functions in kernel (with dev_mc_add and dev_mc_delete) 
> | where you can find similar code. If the described situation is really error 
> | then this fuctions should be fixed too. I used 2.6.2 and 2.4.18 kernels.
> 
> I see.  So why do all callers of dev_mc_add() and dev_mc_delete()
> not check the return value of those functions??  Anyone?

It's totally an oversight, I included the net/core/dev.c changes but
the other instances are much harder to fix and they do need to be fixed.
They are harder to cure because they need to undo a lot of state if
dev_mc_*() should fail, also some of the call chains all return void
and would need to be changed in that respect too.
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux