On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 01:06:15 +0200 (EET) Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> wrote: > As for IPVS like setups, the requirements need per IP tunning which > is possible only with some kind of filtering, not a global flag, > especially for the input device. Note that the "hidden" flag > is checked for the target device, this was the only way to > differentiate by device. May be this is a proof arp_announce is > not for IPVS :) It is mostly to work with other stacks because > I'm flooded with emails about how Linux ARP can be more friendly. So this new 'arp_announce' change suggestion will preempt any need for hidden and make everyone happy? About output_route vs. inet_select_addr(), probably the latter is better. Your goal is to differentiate between primary and seconday addrs on a device right? Route lookup is also more expensive, probably. - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
