In message <4001F33A.9000802@trash.net> you write: > Julian Anastasov wrote: > > >- provide oif learned from the input route (as before the discussed > >change). May be in 99% of the setups it selects the right route. > >I think, we should use this, at least for 2.4. > > > > > > > Why should we do a route lookup at all ? MASQUERADE doesn't need the > dst_entry but only the interface address. Using ifa_list->ifa_local > of the outgoing in_device seems like the simplest solution to me. You take all the fun out. Yes, this is the best. It always does *something*, and is predictable. People with really complex routing shouldn't really use MASQUERADE, since it's designed for a specific, simple case. Patch? Cheers, Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
