Nico Schottelius wrote : > > Is there _anyone_ responsable for the wireless (802.11*) drivers in the > Linux kernel? Yes, the individual driver authors. Either check the names in the source code or check my Howto. > - easy interface = support for wireless tools Can't agree me, but I'm biased. This is slowly improving. > - compatibility with 2.5/2.6 modul interface Wireless drivers included in kernel 2.6.X are already compatible. > - support for AP-Master/AP/Ad-Hoc/Monitor Modus (like HostAP can do) There is two aspect there. First, I want the HostAP driver to be included in 2.6.X, and I'm trying to make this happen. Second, Master and Monitor mode can be implemented only in drivers for which the necessary hardware documentation is available, which means only a subset of them. > - device naming scheme should be wlanX -> easier to see what it is There are pros and cons to that. Personally I prefer the approach taken by the aironet driver (ethX + wifiX). The interface the driver present to the kernel is *really* an Ethernet interface. If you really want easy identification, we could take the *BSD approach where every driver use it's own unique device name. > - support for external encryption (kernel modules/user space) like WLSec Let's not reinvent the wheel again. What's wrong with IPsec ? If you want to go that route, at least follow one of the upcomming standard (802.1x, WPA, ...). Jean - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
