Re: 2.6 IPSEC + SNAT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello!

> Has anyone else thought about this problem?

I thought about this (ages ago, so this can be stale)
The verdict was that self-consistent picture is possible only
when NAT rules are integral part of SPD. It does not look like
a stimulating idea. :-)


> I have considered introducing a new NAT chain between filtering
> and routing where you can place SNAT rules into.

I do not understand this. In this case IPsec is to be applied to _translated_
packet, is not it? Am I wrong? If I am not wrong, there is no place to add
an additional hook.

Alexey
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux