Re: 2.6 IPSEC + SNAT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At Wed, 1 Oct 2003 23:10:52 +0200,
Jose Luis Domingo Lopez <linux-net@24x7linux.com> wrote:
...
> To the best of my knowledge you can NAT IPsec traffic if the outer
> transformation is ESP and not AH. NAT traversal seems to be only
> necessary if you do AH or ESP+AH, because AH headers also covers IP
> packet headers, and any change in them render the checksums bad.
Not true.

IPesc NAT Traversal is only for ESP.
(and for IKE packets)

see draft-ietf-ipsec-udp-encaps-06.txt

-mk
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux