Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > > Ok, then how would you propose to be able to send
> > > packets out an interface _before_ we have addresses
> > > assigned to it?
> > >
> > IP packets you mean? You don't? ;) It would depend on why you're
> > doing it naturally. Mostly, I'd have thought that if a host doesn't have
an
> > IP number it doesn't get to use ARP.
>
> Of course it gets to use ARP, nothing prevents this.
Huh? RFC 826 states that the requesting arp packet sends the protocol
address of itself. So no address is no arp.

Allowing it to is a violation of that rfc

Regards,
Bas


-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux