In article <3F17245D.9040806@us.ibm.com> (at Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:34:05 -0700), Krishna Kumar <krkumar@us.ibm.com> says: > have any knowledge of using this new interface. If you prefer, I can split the > patch for prefix list vs O/M bits so that the former is accepted without any > issues. Someone else can modify the O/M to suit new needs. Does that sound OK > with you ? Yes, please split up the patch. > > At least, new RTM_xxx should not be restricted to get such flags. > > That's why I had suggested that we can use RTM_GETLNKINFO with more information, > like RTA_IFFLAGS, and other things like stats or whatever. That can be done > easily enough and still be functionally complete. I just don't have any idea > about this new interface. > > Is this still a problem ? Hmm, I might miss something. Anyway, it seems we're reaching consensus. --yoshfuji - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
