Re: [PATCH 1/4] Prefix List against 2.5.73

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In article <200307150117.FAA06705@dub.inr.ac.ru> (at Tue, 15 Jul 2003 05:17:53 +0400 (MSD)), kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru says:

> Hello!
> 
> > inet6_fill_ifaddr (and introduce RTM_IFACEFLAGS). This will be specific to
> > IPv6. Are you agreeable to this ?
> ...
> > +	IFA_IFFLAGS,
> 
> What's about ifa_flags? There is some space there, and the things
> kept there now: TENTATIVE/DEPRECATED et al. are close relatives
> of O/M.

Alexey, O/M are not flags for addresses, but for interfaces.
I believe we should not mix them up.

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux