The comment to tg3_free_rings() routine states:
tp->{tx,}lock is not held and we are not in an interrupt context and thus may sleep.
However in 2 places (tg3_open() and tg3_close()) this function is called with
both locks held.
Is this comment not relevant anymore ? I'm looking at 2.4.22-pre5 code.
Thanks.
Felix.
- : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
