Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote (on Saturday, June 28, 2003 20:20:53 +0100):

> On Sad, 2003-06-28 at 01:27, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>> That's a trivial change to make if you want it. we just add a "reviewed"
>> / "certified" state between "new" and "assigned". Yes, might be a good 
>> idea.  I'm not actually that convinced that "assigned" is overly useful
>> in the context of open-source, but that's a separate discussion.
> 
> Most bugzilla's seem to use VERIFIED for this, and it means people who
> have better things to do can just pull bugs that are verified and/or
> tagged with "patch" in the attachments

Hmmm. we have VERIFIED set up to mean that the proposed fix has been
verified to work. Could reshuffle it, or we could find a different
word I guess - reusing the same one might cause confusion (on the
other hand ...using the same word for different things in different
bugzillas is confusing too ...)

M.


-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux