In article <20030623212445.GA24929@gondor.apana.org.au> (at Tue, 24 Jun 2003 07:24:45 +1000), Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> says: > This does make sense for if you KM has policies defined which only differ > by port numbers. It may also be needed for dynamic policies if the peer > only accepts the most restricted selector. Excuse me, what does KM here stand for? -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
