Hi Dave and Yoshfuji, I have a question about the following, which seems to be the approach both of you prefer. I thought we need a new routing message type called RTM_GETPLIST which will return full prefix list. If you use RTA_RA6INFO, then should that trigger only when the prefix list has changed (add or delete) ? Should I have both interfaces, one for returning entire list (RTM) and one for changes in prefix list (RTA) ? Please let me know if my understanding is correct. Thanks, - KK David S. Miller wrote: > From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> > Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 11:02:49 +0900 (JST) > > Again, what I proposed was to store prefix information on fib with > some flags to represent advertised by routers and give user-space > the RA information using new rtattr (RTA_RA6INFO or something like that). > > This sounds very reasonable. > - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
