Re: Possible memory leak in xfrm_policy_insert

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



   From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
   Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 20:08:33 +1000

   On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 03:01:35AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
   > Sure, the cpu list is just fixed.  That's the only difference
   > in this area I believe.
   
   What I mean is how do I schedule timers that run on a particular CPU in
   2.4?

Oh crap, you're right, it won't work :(  We'd need to use threads
or something, horrible.

Ok, I guess we have to stick with a smp_call_function() based scheme.
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux