On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Simon Kirby wrote: > I was going to ask before, and it's probably not even possible anymore, > but have you tried on a 2.0 kernel before? 2.0 kernels probably have a > lot of other problems and don't support the new hardware, but it would be > interesting to see how it scales to many srcs/dsts before the route cache > was integrated. It probably scales a lot more like FreeBSD does. You'd > probably have to use eepro100s or something, though. > As a side note, note that stateless forwarding like BSD patricie tries is no longer sufficient. Its no longer just looking up a nexthop, dec ttl, recompute csum that we are optimizing for. The dst cache/flowi is the way to go, so theres no going back;-> - we just gotta make what we have work better. cheers, jamal - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
