On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 12:29:08AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > > Look to xfrm_state.c for ideas, deferring real policy kill to > some GC'ish task. This allows many other schemes to be experimented > with as well. OK, as long as flow_cache_flush can wait, we don't need the destructor. However, should I bother with smp_call_function? It seems that I'll have to disable local IRQs at least once on the fast path to use it. Alternatively I can stay with the rcu and just wait for the callbacks to finish. -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
