Re: netlink tester program

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>    From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
>    Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 20:34:19 -0700
>
>    > See, a document is NOT the spec, the code is the spec.
>
>    That's hardly the only development model.
>
> It's the one that works for _me_ and Alexey and myself, and we're the ones
> doing all the work.

Do you want it to remain that way?

> When someone doing the work desires the docs and desires to
> WRITE it, it will appear.
>
> You can expect exactly nothing more in our development model.
> If you require me to write the docs, you misunderstand how the
> system works :)
>
>    You clipped out the text where I pointed out that bugs can
>    be in specs as well as code.  They can be fixed there, too.
>
> Very true.  So when Randy writes the more detailed netlink/rtnetlink docs,
> we'll be happy :-)
>
> There is even an official IETF RFC written by Jamal, Alexey, and
> others documenting netlink btw :-))))))))))))
>
> Did anybody notice this?

Yes.

~Randy



-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux