Re: [PATCH] Fix hard_use for xfrm_state

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 01:10:21AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> 
> It is exactly the intention.  The use expiration is meant to expire
> the state X seconds after the first packet ever using that
> transformation is created.

Thanks for the explanation.  I mixed up its semantics with the one
in the SPD.

Which brings up the reason I went looking there in the first place :)
Would you object if I added use_time expiration for the SPD?

In addition to expiring the policy which can be done within the timer
function, I'd also like a mechanism to notify the key managers.  I'm
thinking of adding XFRM_MSG_POLEXPIRE for that purpose.

Does this sound acceptable to you?

The appliation I had in mind for this is to automatically expire
pass policies which is added by FreeSWAN for every single failed
Opportunistic negotiation.  As you can imagine, on a busy host you'll
soon end up with quite a number of those.  If we had the use_time
expiration feature, then unused pass policied can be cleaned up
automatically (as it is, FreeSWAN scans the SPD periodically to get
rid of them).
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux