I dont think the hashes are similar - its the effect into the slow path. I was told by someone who tested this on a priicey CISCO that they simply die unless capable of a feature called CEF. cheers, jamal On Mon, 19 May 2003, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Jamal Hadi <hadi@shell.cyberus.ca> > Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 21:23:08 -0400 (EDT) > > Also used to attack CISCOs by them kiddies btw. We stand much better > than any CISCO doing caching. > > I have to assume that the source address selection operates > differently for attacking cisco equiptment, our hashes being > identical would really be unbelievable :-) > > > - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
