Two of the comments in net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c seem to disagree, at least
to me.
(a)
* Yuji SEKIYA @USAGI: Support default route on router node;
* remove ip6_null_entry from the top of
* routing table.
(b)
/*
* The top fib of ip6 routing table includes ip6_null_entry.
*/
This patch could be wrong, but it deletes (b), on the basis that
the top <leaf> in the ip6 routing table points to ip6_null_entry.
Patch is for 2.5.69.
Comments?
--
~Randy
patch_name: ipv6_fib_comment.patch
patch_version: 2003-05-06.11:47:11
author: Randy.Dunlap <rddunlap@osdl.org>
description: remove incorrect comment;
product: Linux
product_versions: 2.5.69
maintainer: davem@redhat.com
diffstat: =
net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c | 3 ---
1 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff -Naur ./net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c%CMNT ./net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
--- ./net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c%CMNT 2003-05-04 16:53:37.000000000 -0700
+++ ./net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c 2003-05-06 11:46:44.000000000 -0700
@@ -434,9 +434,6 @@
if (fn->fn_flags&RTN_TL_ROOT &&
fn->leaf == &ip6_null_entry &&
!(rt->rt6i_flags & (RTF_DEFAULT | RTF_ADDRCONF | RTF_ALLONLINK)) ){
- /*
- * The top fib of ip6 routing table includes ip6_null_entry.
- */
fn->leaf = rt;
rt->u.next = NULL;
goto out;
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
