> David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com> [Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 11:38:20PM -0700]: > From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru > Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 23:48:02 +0400 (MSD) > > > I'm including a patch that avoids touching in6_rtmsg, and instead > > passes the netlink message around. Is this acceptable? > > Yes, it looks OK. [original diff is copied for Dave] > >Applied. I'm not too familiar with the Linux kernel development cycle. I assume that this means that the fix will (eventually) show up in the 2.4 train of kernels. If so, which 2.4 should I look for it to arrive in? Will it also show up in 2.6 when that's released, or should I start pulling the fix up to 2.5 now? mrr - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
