Re: Odd happenings - assertion failed at tcp.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Is 2.4.21-preX stable in a production environment?

Also, I just received several other interesting messages:

sending pkt_too_big (len[1500] pmtu[1476]) to self
sending pkt_too_big (len[1500] pmtu[1476]) to self
sending pkt_too_big (len[1500] pmtu[1476]) to self
sending pkt_too_big (len[1500] pmtu[1476]) to self
sending pkt_too_big (len[1500] pmtu[1476]) to self

Is this also something fixed in the preX kernel versions?

These messages came after the previous messages I mentioned yesterday.

Thanks,
Brad



On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, David S. Miller wrote:

>    From: Brad Stockdale <brad@greenepa.net>
>    Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 21:57:37 -0500 (EST)
>    
>       I run 2.4.20 on almost all of my machines, but this is the first time I 
>    have seen the error messages in question... They were in dmesg. The 
>    machine has been in production for about 2 days now.
> 
> The bug is fixed in current 2.4.21-preX
>    
> 
> 

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux