RE: Tiny eepro100 vs. e100 NFS benchmark

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Quick conclusion:
> 
> Using the eepro100 driver results in comparable sequential 
> read performance of the e100 driver.  However, the eepro100 
> driver gives measurably and noticably better NFS write performance.
> 
> Seems like e100 has a problem with filling a 100Mbit line TX, 
> while RX is better than eepro100. At least for RPC over UDP 
> in this isolated case...

You might try disabling microcode with e100, or adjusting TX_FRAME_COUNT
to zero.  Both will decrease latencies at the expense of more
interrupts.

-scott
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux