Re: [Bridge] Re: [patch] A more general way to hook into the rx path.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> People can implement proprietary TCP stacks using this "nifty
> hook" you've created.  So I can't accept these changes.

Is this a religeous argument, or is there a technical or legal issue
lurking here that I'm not aware of?  (Linux has all kinds of hooks people
can and do use to implement proprietary things.  Is this one different
somehow?)

Thanks for clarifying!

Steve Work
scw@renlabs.com

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux