On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Frank 'xraz' Fricke wrote: > |On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Frank 'xraz' Fricke wrote: > |> What is the common practice/workaround for the interface-selection > |> problem with multiple ipv6-defaultroutes? I could not find something > |> working on the net. > | > |Could you be a bit more specific which issue you're referring to? How is > |this different from IPv4? > > If you have two (or more) sit-tunnels wich have a 2000::/3 or > default route, (at least replys to incoming) packtes are always > sent via the route last added. Are you sure these routes are identical? I recall doing some testing and noting that at least some packets would be load-balanced between identical routes. > I cannot find a way to force sending > the packets with the interface that matches their source address. The behaviour is the same as with IPv4, and circumventing it requires so-called policy routing; I'm not sure if this is supported in IPv6. You may be able to get additional ideas from e.g. http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.html -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
