"David S. Miller" wrote: > > From: george anzinger <george@mvista.com> > Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 07:16:24 -0700 > > [ BTW please start using newlines in your emails, instead of 1,000 > character monstrosities lacking them. Thanks ] Sure. I am trying to find something that works with patches as well as text. Still looking I guess. > > On the other hand, I prefer to think of the linux community as a > group of folks working on making one of the best OSs on the planet > even better. > > Right, and I don't think CONFIG_PREEMPT makes the planet better. > In fact, now that you mention it, I think CONFIG_PREEMPT is a pile > of crap. Can we agree to disagree :) > > > It requires a full audit of the networking in the new preemption > > environment. > > Any pointers on what to look for would be welcome. > > And you go right back to asking me to do the work for you. > What is wrong with you? I said they would be welcome, not that you have to reply... -- George Anzinger george@mvista.com High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ Real time sched: http://sourceforge.net/projects/rtsched/ Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
