From: george anzinger <george@mvista.com> Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 17:26:29 -0700 Ah, but we have. in_interrupt() was fixed about a month ago. I think Robert got it into all the patches. Whats more, it is a bit faster too :) Well, back to the main point, this code is pretty stable by any measurement. I truly believe it is some side effect of either a preemption gotcha or a driver bug. - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
