Ben Greear wrote:
> --- linux-2.4.16/drivers/net/eepro100.c Mon Nov 12 18:47:18 2001
> +++ linux/drivers/net/eepro100.c Tue Dec 18 11:36:11 2001
> @@ -510,12 +510,12 @@
> static const char i82557_config_cmd[CONFIG_DATA_SIZE] = {
> 22, 0x08, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x32, 0x03, 1, /* 1=Use MII 0=Use AUI */
> 0, 0x2E, 0, 0x60, 0,
> - 0xf2, 0x48, 0, 0x40, 0xf2, 0x80, /* 0x40=Force full-duplex */
> + 0xf2, 0x48, 0, 0x40, 0xfa, 0x80, /* 0x40=Force full-duplex */
> 0x3f, 0x05, };
> static const char i82558_config_cmd[CONFIG_DATA_SIZE] = {
> 22, 0x08, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0x22, 0x03, 1, /* 1=Use MII 0=Use AUI */
> 0, 0x2E, 0, 0x60, 0x08, 0x88,
> - 0x68, 0, 0x40, 0xf2, 0x84, /* Disable FC */
> + 0x68, 0, 0x40, 0xfa, 0x84, /* Disable FC */
> 0x31, 0x05, };
hmmm. hmmm. hmmm.
I am sorely tempted to drop this patch, simply because it's changing one
magic number to another. One key question I have is, what the fsck does
this patch really do??? If it turns on VLAN [de-]tagging
unconditionally, for example, that's unacceptable.
Comments and insight requested, and appreciated.
Jeff
--
Jeff Garzik |
Building 1024 |
MandrakeSoft | Choose life.
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
