Re: IFF_PROMISC bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



   From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
   Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 03:44:57 -0500

   [sigh, I meant to have said that we can support IFF_PROMISC for
   SIOCGIFFLAGS -only-, until the end of time.  I agree with you that
   SIOCSIFFLAGS+IFF_PROMISC clearly is unsupportable.]
   
Then you will break more than what you claim is broken right now.

At least the current code RESPECTS setting IFF_PROMISC if an app uses
SIOCSIFFLAGS to do it, your version would not.

I think you'll be breaking more apps that way, in fact right off the
bat your version will break all current NMAP binaries out there.
That's just the first thing I checked, there are surely several other
examples.

The more and more I look at this situation, the more and more I
respect Alexey's decision to implement things how they are now.
It is the the only reasonable choice, really...
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux