Re: hires timestamps for netif_rx()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



   From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
   Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 21:14:08 +0100

   On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 12:09:05PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
   > Andi, i386 SMP? :-)
   
   If you used do_gettimeofday unconditionally then everybody would eat the readlock, not 
   only i386 (unless you change it to be lockless first like andrea did for the 
   x86-64 vsyscall version) 
   
   If you didn't propose to use it unconditionally then I
   misunderstood you and I apologize.

Andi, the x86 platforms that have SMP have TSC and in that
case do_get_fast_time == do_gettimeofday and there is no read locking
:-))))))))))))

This is the whole point of this, get_fast_time is total garbage.
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux