RE: NAT on multihomed host

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > I tryed with iproute2, these are my rules & routes:
> >
> > # ip ru l
> > 0:      from all lookup local
> > 32764:  from 64.x.x.128/26 lookup uunet
> > 32765:  from 200.x.x.192/27 lookup comsat
> > 32766:  from all lookup main
> > 32767:  from all lookup default
> 
> 	the above order of rules is not correct. Use the following
> nano-howto from Christoph, there is example for netfilter setup
> using 2 internet lines:
> 
> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/nano.txt

Thank you for the response, I'll try with this info..

> > # ip r l
> > 200.x.x.192/27 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 200.x.x.219
> > 64.x.x.128/26 dev eth1  proto kernel  scope link  src 64.x.x.131
> > 192.168.x.0/24 dev eth2  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.x.200
> > default
> >         nexthop via 200.x.x.222  dev eth0 weight 1 dead
> >         nexthop via 64.x.x.129  dev eth1 weight 1
> >
> >
> > The "dead" flag stays there, and never uses the 200.x.x.x 
> route.. Do you
> > know why it could be?
> 
> 	This is a known problem in iproute2:
> 
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2001q4/002126.html
> 

That email talks about "RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument", I think that's
another issue..

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux