On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Wilson Yeung wrote: > I sent this to the more general linux-kernel mailing list, but perhaps > this is a better forum for my question. > > This topic has been brought up before, but I'm wondering where the current > state of affairs is on this. > > I have a need to perform high resolution timestamping on received packets > (traffic measurement). I realize that interrupt latency may prevent me > from getting a truly accurate timestamp, but best effort here seems to be > better than not-so-best effort. I am not sure if this would solve your problem, but we have a project which implements high resolution timers for Linux http://www.ittc.ku.edu/kurt/ KURT stands for KU realtime - a realtime implementation of Linux. But you can choose to enable only the high resolution timer called as UTIME. HTH. ciao, Amit -- The statement below is true. The statement above is false. ^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^ Amit Kucheria EECS Grad. Research Assistant University of Kansas @ Lawrence (R)+1-(785)-830 8521 ||| (O)+1-(785)-864 7774 ____________________________________________________ - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
