On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 prueba3@frh.utn.edu.ar wrote: > Hi! > > >Single Unix says EAFNOSUPPORT should be returned by socket(2) too, > >so it could be changed. > > Why does Single Unix say socket(2) should return EAFNOSUPPORT? > > I mean, as far as I know, the first argument of socket(2) is a protocol family, and *not* an address family... > > Greetings, > Fernando Gont > e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar > > I thought that, AF_INET for example in the first argument stood for Address_Family_Internet? Could be a misnomer however :) Chris - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
