Re: Linux Kernel firewalling.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 09:10:49AM -0800, Stephen Satchell wrote:
> At 02:34 PM 3/7/01 +0100, J.R. de Jong wrote:
> >I've got a question concerning firewalling. ICMP, UDP and TCP can be
> >filtered out with ipchains/iptables, but what about IPX, ARP, netbios and
> >such? To make my question more clear let me explain what I want.
> 
> ARP does not propagate across network segments.  I never enable IPX in my

unless you bridge or proxyarp, but in that case its deliberate :]

> >We have a network connected to the internet. Inside this network I want to
> >put a firewall. This firewall has two network adapters each with a
> >different network. The first is connected to the network and the other is
> >connected to a switch. On this switch we have a (beowulf) cluster of
> >machines.
> 
> So you have Internet <-> campus network <-> firewall <-> Beowulf cluster
> with switch
> 
> >Now, if I disable IP forwarding and make the firewall airtight in the
> >sense that I use ipchains to deny any traffic between the networks does
> >anything low level from the switch or whatever still propogate to the
> >other network?

AFAIK ipchains will only filter IP traffic.  you can use --proto to pick
out/block "subprotocols" in IP (like TCP, UDP, ICMP, IGMP and others),
but it doesn't extend beyond IP.  i think there was a posting recently
on linux-kernel from someone working on MAC-level filtering.  if i can
dig up an archive url i will post it here.
 
> >Our IT people are against this setup and want to maintain the switch
> >themselves (which means it should be accesible to them) for the reason
> >that, as they say, it is still possible that this switch can cause hickups
> >in their network.
> 
> Then they don't understand firewalls, period.  If the IP addresses you use
> inside the firewall aren't routable (like net 10, the network I usually use

10/8 is perfectly routeable.  most (no, unfortunately not all) internet
routers just drop it however.

> computer, in either direction.  Indeed, your IT people won't be able to
> affect the Beowulf cluster, the result I believe you desire.

isn't this every non-IT person's dream ? ;D

j.

-- 
all your base are belong to us!
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux