Em Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 01:18:56AM +0000, Petr Vandrovec escreveu:
> On 2 Mar 01 at 1:05, J.R. de Jong wrote:
> >
> > This was probably the '&& 0' patched version :(. I've just sent a tcpdump
> > of 2.4.2-pre6 + the patch you mailed. It contains pieces like:
>
> Thanks.
>
> > 00:29:18.227882 0:d0:b7:18:62:e3 > Broadcast sap e0 ui/C
> > >>> IPX transport Data: (98 bytes)
> > [000] FF FF 00 D9 01 14 00 1D 80 22 FF FF FF FF FF FF ........ ."......
> > [010] 05 53 00 1D 80 22 00 E0 29 09 CA 6A 05 53 00 1D .S...".. )..j.S..
> > [020] 80 22 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ."...... ........
> > [030] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 FC 03 ........ ........
> > --
> > 00:29:21.754475 0:d0:b7:18:62:e3 > Broadcast sap e0 ui/C
> > >>> Unknown IPX Data: (51 bytes)
> > [000] FF FF 00 66 01 14 00 1D 80 22 FF FF FF FF FF FF ...f.... ."......
> > [010] 05 55 00 1D 80 22 00 00 C0 B8 E0 DC 05 55 00 1D .U...".. .....U..
> > [020] 80 22 00 01 00 00 00 1E 06 01 53 4E 41 50 50 59 ."...... ..SNAPPY
> > [030] 02 02 06 ...
> > --
>
> But WHY you are sending this packet? It must came here from somewhere...
>
> It looks like that 'if (intrfc != ifcs) continue;' line in patch does
ouch, dumb me, it should be 'if (intrfc == ifcs) continue;'
^^
we want to skip our interface not all the others ;(
> not work as expected, but without seeing incoming packet it is hard to
> guess what went wrong. And second packet is totally braindamaged: it has
> set netbios packet prop. type, but did not leave first 32bytes of packet
> unused... Is it DOOM advertising packet, or what? (do you know some
> 'snappy'?)
hey, DOOM is not allowed here, get serious ;P :D
- Arnaldo
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
