Re: IPX broadcast forwarding in 2.4.1 kernels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Em Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 03:31:24PM +0000, Petr Vandrovec escreveu:
> On 28 Feb 01 at 21:22, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:54:52PM +0100, J.R. de Jong escreveu:
> 
> > > phone call from the IT ppl. isn't very efficient. Moreover, I prefer
> > > testing at night so I won't be a bother to the network when ppl. are
> > > actually using it. I guess I need some monitoring tool like tcpdump
> > > (doesn't really provide any useful IPX output) or netdiag. Suggestions?
> 
> Send 64 bytes of zeroes packet with source XXXXXXXX:YYYYYYYYYYYY/0455 to 
> 00000000:FFFFFFFFFFFF/0455 [sipx_type=0x14]. All machines which respond
> and are not routers should be verified. And if broadcast storm does not
> cease to exist in few seconds, it is time to visit your routers and
> switches and hit poweroff button... And then ban all machines which
> participated as senders of these frames...

Nice, I'm putting this on my TODO list: to create simple test utilities to
detect these cases, as a binary or as scripts that use existing packet
generating utilities coupled with tcpdump, of course, if there are
volunteers to do this, they're more than welcome 8)
 
> > into account of Petr told us earlier, I think that I'm getting the grasp on
> > this pprop thing, sorry for being so slow 8)
> 
> Patch looks OK.

thanks for the review
  
> > packet to make the protocol smart (the shared skb thing, related to tcpdump
> > being able to get the packet as they come thru the wire, with the protocol
> > stacks not changing it while in transit), now we don't change nothing in
> 
> Can't we use skb_unshare()?

probably, I'll check later today, after daytime job
 
> > the received packets, maybe we need to change it before handing it up to
> > sock_queue_rcv_skb in ipxitf_def_skb_handler, well, I'm learning, lets see
> > if I manage to fully understand this before commiting any mistake 8) As
> > always, I'm all ears to people with more insight on net stacks, like Petr,
> > thats helping me a lot, thank you!
> 
> I do not think that I have more insight on the net stacks in Linux. 

ok, ok, at least better than me at this point :) Anyway, thank you again
for the reviews and suggestions.

>                                                     Best regards,
>                                                         Petr Vandrovec
>                                                         vandrove@vc.cvut.cz
>                                                         

-- 


                        - Arnaldo
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux