Re: diald vs. d-on-d Poll

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




SoloCDM wrote:

> Which is better to have, a diald or dial-on-demand

What's the difference? Or are you asking about diald vs "pppd demand"?

Personally I've found diald to work fine.

Aside: before I moved in here and set up a linux diald box as the
router, the house LAN was using Windows Internet Connection Sharing. 
This connected on demand OK, but never disconnected of its own accord. 
The net result was an £1800 bill for one quarter.

-- 
Glynn Clements <glynn@sensei.co.uk>
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux