> First let me convert the diagram into my interpretation of yours.
>
> 10.67.28.0/24
> -----------+----------------------------------+-----------
> eth1 | 10.67.28.2 eth1 | 10.67.28.2
I fooled, correct @ is 10.67.28.1 !
> +-----+-----+ +-----+------+
> | FIREWALL | | HOST |
> | | | |
> +-----+-----+ +-----+------+
> eth0 | 10.67.27.2 eth0 | 10.67.27.1
> -----------+----------------------------------+-----------
> 10.67.27.0/24
>
> Is there a typo in the IP addresses on the eth1 interface(s)? They are
> identical, on two distinctly different hosts.
Yes, there is a typo ...
> If the IP address on eth1 of HOST is indeed incorrect, then on HOST try
> the following:
>
> route add -host 10.67.28.2 gw 10.67.27.2 dev eth0
>
> The 'dev eth0' maybe optional.
At the moment, I've tried
route add -host 10.67.28.1 eth0
which was unsuccessful. I don't have the platform anymore for more
attempts. Anyway, as soon as possible, I'll try your proposal
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
