Re: u32 and fw classifiers for CBQ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I've some problems using  the u32 classifier in a CBQ tree, i.e I'm able
> to filter with some rules like 'match ip dst ', 'match ip dport' but I
> can't filter with rules like  'match tcp dst', or 'match u8 0x10 0xff at
> nexthdr+2' in order to point directly to the  tcp destination port in
> the TCP fragment . It can be a problem I think in case of  IP packets
> with options.

As far as I can see the nexthdr+N option simply does not work.

You can simulate it to a certain extent by testing the ip header length
for the default, and then just using the standard offset.

Here is an example of finding TCP ACK's:

    # match acks the hard way, 
    #       IP protocol 6, 
    #       IP header length 0x5(32 bit words), 
    #       IP Total length 0x34
    #       TCP ack set (bit 5, offset 33)
    tc filter add dev $IF parent 20:0 protocol ip prio 10 u32 \
	    match ip protocol 6 0xff \
	    match u8 0x05 0x0f at 0 \
	    match u8 0x34 0xff at 3 \
	    match u8 0x10 0xff at 33 \
	    flowid 20:23

Maybe someday nexthdr will get fixed....
 
 
-- 
sdjl@fireplug.net

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux