best documented, maybe so.. up-to-date, think again :) On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Hariharan L Thantry wrote: > ' > > > 2.0.34 is the best documented linux kernel out there... > the entire core commentary is based on it...and as you yourself admitted, > probably has no relevance to this discussion.. > > have a great day. > hari > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Hariharan L. Thantry > thantryh@cse.msu.edu > > 4642, S. Hagadorn Road, #E6 Dept of Computer Science and Engg > East Lansing, MI 48823 Michigan State University > East Lansing, MI 48824-1226 > Ph(res): 1-517-332-2645 Ph(off): 1-517-353-6646 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Statux wrote: > > > 2.0.34 is very old.. upgrade! :) Not that it's relevant to this stuff.. > > but 2.4.0 is almost out, ya know :) > > > > On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Hariharan L Thantry wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Whenever, the accept() call succeeds, it creates a new sock data structure > > > which is added to the linked list of existing socks. However, I doubt that > > > any settings made by setsockopt() for the original socket remain in the > > > new inherited socket (2.0.34 kernel). > > > > > > This is my impression. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Hari > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Statux wrote: > > > > > > > > How's the water mark being set? Can you provide > > > > > any pointer to sites that contains these information. > > > > > > > > The water marks are the amount of data in the buffers before data will be > > > > sent/received, etc. > > > > > > > > check out getsockopt > > > > > > > > - > > > > : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in > > > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu > > > > > > > > > > - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
