Re: Development status on bthernet bonding?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 02:09:17AM +0200, Dan Browning wrote:
> 
> I think FEC is a pretty great functionality for servers that need more than
> 100mbps but can't afford 1gbps, and I'm supprised that there isn't more
> clamoring for it's inclusion.

TEQL and route based load balancing works for near all people, so there is 
not much demand for just another channel bundling system in addition to 
the three(five if you count ppp) Linux already has.


-Andi
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux