Re: Gigabit NIC question.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

> > Richard> It might not be a 2.0.36 driver that is needed. It may be the
> > Richard> 2.0.36 reliability!
> > 
> > 2.0.36 reliawhat?? If you are looking for GigE performance you are
> > likely to want SMP and SMP in 2.0.36 is absolutely not realiable.
> 
> Actually by 2.0.36 its very reliable. It still gives sucky performance.
> 
> Alan


forbin:~# uname -a;uptime
Linux forbin 2.0.36 #2 SMP Sun Apr 4 14:04:56 AKDT 1999 i686 unknown
  7:40pm  up 435 days,  2:43,  1 user,  load average: 5.46, 5.30, 5.28


	Dual PPro 200Mhz, 128M ECC FPM @66mhz
	Ultra-Wide + Cheetas


	Box has been rebooted once since the last kernel build, when
we lost power for 4 hrs.  We had 3.5 hrs backup power.

	Right about the network io though, it will easily max a single
100Mbit interface, but won't go past 180Mbit total (box has 2 100Mbit
FD interfaces).


---
As folks might have suspected, not much survives except roaches, 
and they don't carry large enough packets fast enough...
        --About the Internet and nuclear war.


-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux