Re: Gigabit NIC question.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca> writes:

Richard> Indeed. A procmail recipe even avoids you having to see the
Richard> crap in the first place. I can see why some people use the
Richard> base64 abortion, though: if they inline a patch it gets
Richard> filled with "=3D" gunk, because they're using some or other
Richard> character set encoding :-(

Happens just as often from people with iso8859-1 setups due to broken
/ misconfigured mail clients.

>> Kim, if you want Gigabit Ethernet I'd strongly recommend you
>> consider porting whatever it is you have that requires 2.0.x onto
>> 2.2.x or later.

Richard> It might not be a 2.0.36 driver that is needed. It may be the
Richard> 2.0.36 reliability!

2.0.36 reliawhat?? If you are looking for GigE performance you are
likely to want SMP and SMP in 2.0.36 is absolutely not realiable.

Jes
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux